Beyond Procedure: Substantive Fairness in Conformal Prediction

Our paper, Beyond Procedure: Substantive Fairness in Conformal Prediction, with Pengqi Liu, Zijun Yu, Mouloud Belbahri, Masoud Asgharian, and Jesse Cresswell, is now available on https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16794

Conformal prediction (CP) offers distribution-free uncertainty quantification for machine learning models, yet its interplay with fairness in downstream decision-making remains underexplored. Moving beyond CP as a standalone operation (procedural fairness), we analyze the holistic decision-making pipeline to evaluate substantive fairness-the equity of downstream outcomes. Theoretically, we derive an upper bound that decomposes prediction-set size disparity into interpretable components, clarifying how label-clustered CP helps control method-driven contributions to unfairness. To facilitate scalable empirical analysis, we introduce an LLM-in-the-loop evaluator that approximates human assessment of substantive fairness across diverse modalities. Our experiments reveal that label-clustered CP variants consistently deliver superior substantive fairness. Finally, we empirically show that equalized set sizes, rather than coverage, strongly correlate with improved substantive fairness, enabling practitioners to design more fair CP systems. Our code is available at this https URL.


OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
Arthur Charpentier (February 20, 2026). Beyond Procedure: Substantive Fairness in Conformal Prediction. Freakonometrics. Retrieved March 5, 2026 from https://doi.org/10.58079/15qrz


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.