In the introduction of my course next week, I will (briefly) mention networks, and I wanted to provide some illustration of the Friendship Paradox. On network of thrones (discussed in Beveridge and Shan (2016)), there is a dataset with the network of characters in Game of Thrones. The word “friend” might be abusive here, but let’s continue to call connected nodes “friends”. The friendship paradox states that
People on average have fewer friends than their friends
This was discussed in Feld (1991) for instance, or Zuckerman & Jost (2001). Let’s try to see what it means here. First, let us get a copy of the dataset
download.file("https://www.macalester.edu/~abeverid/data/stormofswords.csv","got.csv") GoT=read.csv("got.csv") library(networkD3) simpleNetwork(GoT[,1:2]) |
Because it is difficult for me to incorporate some d3js script in the blog, I will illustrate with a more basic graph,
Consider a vertex v\in V in the undirected graph G=(V,E) (with classical graph notations), and let d(v) denote the number of edges touching it (i.e. v has d(v) friends). The average number of friends of a random person in the graph is \mu = \frac{1}{n_V}\sum_{v\in V} d(v)=\frac{2 n_E}{n_V} The average number of friends that a typical friend has is
\frac{1}{n_V}\sum_{v\in V} \left(\frac{1}{d(v)}\sum_{v'\in E_v} d(v')\right)But
\sum_{v\in V} \left(\frac{1}{d(v)}\sum_{v'\in E_v} d(v')\right)=\sum_{v,v' \in G} \left(<br />
\frac{d(v')}{d(v)}+\frac{d(v)}{d(v')}\right)=\sum_{v,v' \in G}\left(\frac{d(v')^2+d(v)^2}{d(v)d(v')}\right)=\sum_{v,v' \in G} \left(\frac{(d(v')-d(v))^2}{d(v)d(v')}+2\right){\color{red}{\succ}}\sum_{v,v' \in G} \left(2\right)=\sum_{v\in V} d(v)
Thus,\frac{1}{n_V}\sum_{v\in V} \left(\frac{1}{d(v)}\sum_{v'\in E_v} d(v')\right)\succ \frac{1}{n_V}\sum_{v\in V} d(v)
Note that this can be related to the variance decomposition \text{Var}[X]=\mathbb{E}[X^2]-\mathbb{E}[X]^2i.e.\frac{\mathbb{E}[X^2]}{\mathbb{E}[X]} =\mathbb{E}[X]+\frac{\text{Var}[X]}{\mathbb{E}[X]}\succ\mathbb{E}[X](Jensen inequality). But let us get back to our network. The list of nodes is
M=(rbind(as.matrix(GoT[,1:2]),as.matrix(GoT[,2:1]))) nodes=unique(M[,1]) |
and we each of them, we can get the list of friends, and the number of friends
friends = function(x) as.character(M[which(M[,1]==x),2]) nb_friends = Vectorize(function(x) length(friends(x))) |
as well as the number of friends friends have, and the average number of friends
friends_of_friends = function(y) (Vectorize(function(x) length(friends(x)))(friends(y))) nb_friends_of_friends = Vectorize(function(x) mean(friends_of_friends(x))) |
We can look at the density of the number of friends, for a random node,
Nb = nb_friends(nodes) Nb2 = nb_friends_of_friends(nodes) hist(Nb,breaks=0:40,col=rgb(1,0,0,.2),border="white",probability = TRUE) hist(Nb2,breaks=0:40,col=rgb(0,0,1,.2),border="white",probability = TRUE,add=TRUE) lines(density(Nb),col="red",lwd=2) lines(density(Nb2),col="blue",lwd=2) |
and we can also compute the averages, just to check
mean(Nb) [1] 6.579439 mean(Nb2) [1] 13.94243 |
So, indeed, people on average have fewer friends than their friends.
OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
Arthur Charpentier (June 27, 2018). Game of Friendship Paradox. Freakonometrics. Retrieved December 3, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.58079/ovb8
Great article but how did you add color to simpleNetwork?
i don’t get your inequality:
E[x] + (var[x] / E[x]) > E[x]
Take Gaussian R.V. with average of -5 and variance of 5.
You get -5 + (-1) > -5 which is false.
I guess I miss interpret something (Like the \succ sign in this context).
it is on a positive variable ! X is the number of friends !