I have to admit, first, that finding Waldo has been a difficult task. And I did not succeed. Neither could I correctly spot his shirt (because actually, it was what I was looking for). You know, that red-and-white striped shirt. I guess it should have been possible to look for Waldo’s face (assuming that his face does not change) but I still have problems with size factor (and resolution issues too). The problem is not that simple. At thehttp://mlsp2009.conwiz.dk/ conference, a price was offered for writing an algorithm in Matlab. And one can even find Mathematica codes online. But most of the those algorithms are based on the idea that we look for similarities with Waldo’s face, as described in problem 3 on http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~blake/‘s webpage. You can find papers on that problem, e.g. Friencly & Kwan (2009) (based on statistical techniques, but Waldo is here a pretext to discuss other issues actually), or more recently (but more complex) Garg et al. (2011) on matching people in images of crowds.

What about codes in R ? On http://stackoverflow.com/, some ideas can be found (and thank Robert Hijmans for his help on his package). So let us try here to do something, on our own. Consider the following picture,

With the following code (based on the following file) it is possible to import the picture, and to extract the colors (based on an RGB decomposition),

> library(raster) > waldo=brick(system.file("DepartmentStoreW.grd", + package="raster")) > waldo class : RasterBrick dimensions : 768, 1024, 786432, 3 (nrow,ncol,ncell,nlayer) resolution : 1, 1 (x, y) extent : 0, 1024, 0, 768 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax) coord. ref. : NA values : C:\R\win-library\raster\DepartmentStoreW.grd min values : 0 0 0 max values : 255 255 255

My strategy is simple: try to spot areas with white and red stripes (horizontal stripes). Note that here, I ran the code on a Windows machine, the package is not working well on Mac. In order to get a better understanding of what could be done, let us start with something much more simple. Like the picture below, with Waldo (and Waldo only). Here, it is possible to extract the three colors (red, green and blue),

> plot(waldo,useRaster=FALSE)

It is possible to extract the *red* zones (already on the graph above, since red is a primary color), as well as the *white* ones (green zones on the graphs means a white region on the picture, on the left)

# white component white = min(waldo[[1]] , waldo[[2]] , waldo[[3]])>220 focalswhite = focal(white, w=3, fun=mean) plot(focalswhite,useRaster=FALSE) # red component red = (waldo[[1]]>150)&(max( waldo[[2]] , waldo[[3]])<90) focalsred = focal(red, w=3, fun=mean) plot(focalsred,useRaster=FALSE)

i.e. here we have the graphs below, with the white regions, and the red ones,

From those two parts, it has been possible to extract the red-and-white stripes from the picture, i.e. some regions that were red above, and white below (or the reverse),

# striped component striped = red; n=length(values(striped)); h=5 values(striped)=0 values(striped)[(h+1):(n-h)]=(values(red)[1:(n-2*h)]== TRUE)&(values(red)[(2*h+1):n]==TRUE) focalsstriped = focal(striped, w=3, fun=mean) plot(focalsstriped,useRaster=FALSE)

So here, we can easily spot Waldo, i.e. the guy with the red-white stripes (with two different sets of thresholds for the RGB decomposition)

Let us try somthing slightly more complicated, with a zoom on the large picture of the department store (since, to be honest, I know where Waldo is…).

Here again, we can spot the white part (on the left) and the red one (on the right), with some thresholds for the RGB decomposition

Note that we can try to be (much) more selective, playing with threshold. Here, it is not very convincing: I cannot clearly identify the region where Waldo might be (the two graphs below were obtained playing with thresholds)

And if we look at the overall pictures, it is worst. Here are the white zones, and the red ones,

and again, playing with RGB thresholds, I cannot spot Waldo,

Maybe I was a bit optimistic, or ambitious. Let us try something more simple, like finding a flag on the moon. Consider the picture below on the left, and let us see if we can spot an American flag,

Again, on the left, let us identify white areas, and on the right, red ones

Then as before, let us look for horizontal stripes

Waouh, I did it ! That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for R-coders ! Or least for me… So, why might it be interesting to identify areas on pictures ? I mean, I am not Chloe O’Brian, I don’t have to spot flags in a crowd, neither Waldo, nor some terrorists (that might wear striped shirts). This might be fun if you want to give grades for your exams automatically. Consider the two following scans, the template, and a filled copy,

A first step is to identify regions where we expect to find some “*red*” part (I assume here that students have to use a red pencil). Let us start to check on the template and the filled form if we can identify red areas,

exam = stack("C:\\Users\\exam-blank.png") red = (exam[[1]]>150)&(max( exam[[2]] , exam[[3]])<150) focalsred = focal(red, w=3, fun=mean) plot(focalsred,useRaster=FALSE) exam = stack("C:\\Users\\exam-filled.png") red = (exam[[1]]>150)&(max( exam[[2]] , exam[[3]])<150) focalsred = focal(red, w=3, fun=mean) plot(focalsred,useRaster=FALSE)

First, we have to identify areas where students have to fill the blanks. So in the template, identify black boxes, and get the coordinates (here manually)

exam = stack("C:\\Users\\exam-blank.png") black = max( exam[[1]] ,exam[[2]] , exam[[3]])<50 focalsblack = focal(black, w=3, fun=mean) plot(focalsblack,useRaster=FALSE) correct=locator(20) coordinates=locator(20) X1=c(73,115,156,199,239) X2=c(386,428.9,471,510,554) Y=c(601,536,470,405,341,276,210,145,79,15) LISTX=c(rep(X1,each=10),rep(X2,each=10)) LISTY=rep(Y,10) points(LISTX,LISTY,pch=16,col="blue")

The blue points above are where we look for students’ answers. Then, we have to define the vector of correct answers,

CORRECTX=c(X1[c(2,4,1,3,1,1,4,5,2,2)], X2[c(2,3,4,2,1,1,1,2,5,5)]) CORRECTY=c(Y,Y) points(CORRECTX, CORRECTY,pch=16,col="red",cex=1.3) UNCORRECTX=c(X1[rep(1:5,10)[-(c(2,4,1,3,1,1,4,5,2,2) +seq(0,length=10,by=5))]], X2[rep(1:5,10)[-(c(2,3,4,2,1,1,1,2,5,5) +seq(0,length=10,by=5))]]) UNCORRECTY=c(rep(Y,each=4),rep(Y,each=4))

Now, let us get back on red areas in the form filled by the student, identified earlier,

exam = stack("C:\\Users\\exam-filled.png") red = (exam[[1]]>150)&(max( exam[[2]] , exam[[3]])<150) focalsred = focal(red, w=5, fun=mean)

Here, we simply have to compare what the student answered with areas where we expect to find some red in,

ind=which(values(focalsred)>.3) yind=750-trunc(ind/610) xind=ind-trunc(ind/610)*610 points(xind,yind,pch=19,cex=.4,col="blue") points(CORRECTX, CORRECTY,pch=1, col="red",cex=1.5,lwd=1.5)

Crosses on the graph on the right below are the answers identified as correct (here 13),

> icorrect=values(red)[(750-CORRECTY)* + 610+(CORRECTX)] > points(CORRECTX[icorrect], CORRECTY[icorrect], + pch=4,col="black",cex=1.5,lwd=1.5) > sum(icorrect) [1] 13

In the case there are negative points for non-correct answer, we can count how many incorrect answers we had. Here 4.

> iuncorrect=values(red)[(750-UNCORRECTY)*610+ + (UNCORRECTX)] > sum(iuncorrect) [1] 4

So I have not been able to find Waldo, but I least, that will probably save me hours next time I have to mark exams…

I can’t believe it ! Tonight, my daughter came with Waldo’s book, asking for help. The first one was easy, it took us a few seconds to spot Waldo ! Then, came another page: the one above, that I know by heart since I have spent hours on it, with my computer ! Except that Waldo was not where he was supposed to be… as I remember, he was supposed to be in the upper corner, on the left, next to the table, and the girl with red tights

Well, belive me, in my daughter’s book, he was not !

Waldo was gone ! I just can’t belive it !

What about getting several images of Waldo, and running a classifier on it?

Fantastique post, j’aimerais essayer ces techniques pour compter les têtes aux manifestation.

Nice post, Arthur!

Unfortunately R is not very good at image processing. I wish it were, so I could finally get rid of matlab. There’s no reason, I believe, but the fact that people have not been working enough on the signal processing aspects for R.

Using matlab and R, I eventually get mixed up…. 🙁