This afternoon, in class, we’ve seen Wald test, the likelihood-ratio test, and finally the score test. All of them rely on the same idea
and then, use that if with , we can write
Or – slightly more interesting – if , then
Then one can get that
Based on that property, we can derive Wald statistics,
that can be visualized below
The score test is a test on the square of the slope
The idea for the likelihood ratio test is to consider
Observe that can be written, using Taylor’s expansion
for some . The first term is null, since the maximum likelihood estimator is precisely at the maximum of the (log) likelihood. So
That’s more or less where the 2 comes from. Then observe that
and therefore
This test will be discussed further next week (since it is related to Neyman-Pearson’s theorem), but also, that result can be used to derive confidence intervals. With a log-likelihood as follows
it is possible to get a confidence interval for the parameter by looking for‘s such that
We will discuss that idea later on, in the context of profile likelihood.
OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
Arthur Charpentier (October 15, 2015). Where does that 2 come from in the likelihood ratio test? Freakonometrics. Retrieved September 14, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.58079/ov0u
Hello, we can’t see well the pictures, maybe because this is an old thread..? Thank you.
sorry… hyperlink issues follwing a blog transfer (and the fact that I removed some folders of the previous blog)
I will fix it tonight